<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surly Cross-Check Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/</link>
	<description>&#34;It&#039;s all good.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 02:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-3618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, that&#039;s the great thing about the cross-check.  You can run just about any configuration on it with confidence.  My experience in going from a triple to a compact double on my road bikes was that it was more annoying than the triple, which I left in the middle ring 99.999 percent of the time anyway.  I&#039;ve got a single chainring up front with a 12-32 cassette on back of the Surley, and that&#039;s plenty to get me out of my river valley, but then again, I&#039;ve got a few years and a few pounds advantage on you.  If you put me on the spot, I would recommend a triple on front with a MTB configuration on back like I have.  With that, you should be able to climb anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, that&#8217;s the great thing about the cross-check.  You can run just about any configuration on it with confidence.  My experience in going from a triple to a compact double on my road bikes was that it was more annoying than the triple, which I left in the middle ring 99.999 percent of the time anyway.  I&#8217;ve got a single chainring up front with a 12-32 cassette on back of the Surley, and that&#8217;s plenty to get me out of my river valley, but then again, I&#8217;ve got a few years and a few pounds advantage on you.  If you put me on the spot, I would recommend a triple on front with a MTB configuration on back like I have.  With that, you should be able to climb anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-3616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sort of oldish (&gt;70) and overweight (&gt;215 lbs) and ride along the Schuylkill River and up the steep hills of the valley. I have always had triple chain rings on my road bikes but they are hard to shift. If I get a Surly Cross Check, what kind of gearing would you suggest? Doesn&#039;t that single chain mean too much space between gears?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sort of oldish (&gt;70) and overweight (&gt;215 lbs) and ride along the Schuylkill River and up the steep hills of the valley. I have always had triple chain rings on my road bikes but they are hard to shift. If I get a Surly Cross Check, what kind of gearing would you suggest? Doesn&#8217;t that single chain mean too much space between gears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-2153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got to agree that as spec&#039;ed, the complete bike leaves something to be desired.  Most folks that I&#039;m aware of who own one have done as I did and built it up from the frame for their specific purposes.  I can&#039;t think of one that I&#039;ve seen or known of that&#039;s a stock build.

That doesn&#039;t necessarily make it a bad thing that they&#039;ve spec&#039;ed it as they have.  They give you the option of buying the complete bike, albiet with low end components, but I&#039;m guessing that&#039;s a conscious decision based on the versatility of the frame rather than keeping it at a specific price point.

For example, the LHT as equipped is a mighty fine touring bike that would require very little mods if I were going to buy one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree that as spec&#8217;ed, the complete bike leaves something to be desired.  Most folks that I&#8217;m aware of who own one have done as I did and built it up from the frame for their specific purposes.  I can&#8217;t think of one that I&#8217;ve seen or known of that&#8217;s a stock build.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t necessarily make it a bad thing that they&#8217;ve spec&#8217;ed it as they have.  They give you the option of buying the complete bike, albiet with low end components, but I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s a conscious decision based on the versatility of the frame rather than keeping it at a specific price point.</p>
<p>For example, the LHT as equipped is a mighty fine touring bike that would require very little mods if I were going to buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurlyaboutSurly</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SurlyaboutSurly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-2152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surly Cross Checkes are great framesets, but a medicore as complete bikes. They cut corners on their components and you will pay the price. Surly website states that &quot;stuff that works well and doesn’t dent your piggy bank too bad.&quot; What they should say is that, &quot;our goal was to keep the MSRP to $1000 because if we picked quality parts, the bike would be $2000 and no one would buy it.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surly Cross Checkes are great framesets, but a medicore as complete bikes. They cut corners on their components and you will pay the price. Surly website states that &#8220;stuff that works well and doesn’t dent your piggy bank too bad.&#8221; What they should say is that, &#8220;our goal was to keep the MSRP to $1000 because if we picked quality parts, the bike would be $2000 and no one would buy it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GK</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 04:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just bought a cross-check. It&#039;s fantastic. It&#039;s the second cyclocross bike I&#039;ve had. I replaced my specialised tricross exactly because I was unhappy with the braking. To fix this issue would have cost more than I was willing to spend on an old bike. I bought a complete cross-check and got the LBS to replace the from fork with a disc compatible one and put an Avid bb7 on it. The rear brake is still a cantilever but thats not such an issue, afterall its the front brake that will stop you when you need to be stopped. No regrets it&#039;s awesome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a cross-check. It&#8217;s fantastic. It&#8217;s the second cyclocross bike I&#8217;ve had. I replaced my specialised tricross exactly because I was unhappy with the braking. To fix this issue would have cost more than I was willing to spend on an old bike. I bought a complete cross-check and got the LBS to replace the from fork with a disc compatible one and put an Avid bb7 on it. The rear brake is still a cantilever but thats not such an issue, afterall its the front brake that will stop you when you need to be stopped. No regrets it&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Anne’s Toy Ride, Festival of Lights Bike Night and other bike-related news &#171; BikingInLA</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St. Anne’s Toy Ride, Festival of Lights Bike Night and other bike-related news &#171; BikingInLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] local cycling visionary Sky Boyer. Our Missouri cycling reporter is anything but Surly about his new commuter bike. Biking in Heels discusses the important winter-time topic of proper lighting. A great dooring [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] local cycling visionary Sky Boyer. Our Missouri cycling reporter is anything but Surly about his new commuter bike. Biking in Heels discusses the important winter-time topic of proper lighting. A great dooring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracywilkins</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tracywilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DC,

Thanks for visiting!  Yeah, I&#039;ve had that conversation a time or two also.....

As for the single, I really thought about it a lot and decided that I didn&#039;t really need it for this bike.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC,</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting!  Yeah, I&#8217;ve had that conversation a time or two also&#8230;..</p>
<p>As for the single, I really thought about it a lot and decided that I didn&#8217;t really need it for this bike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never considered a single ring on the front before I read about your bike. I&#039;m going to build a bike for my girlfriend with that setup. Hopefully that will end my endless answer of &quot;no, on the left side click the small lever to go uphill.&quot; :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never considered a single ring on the front before I read about your bike. I&#8217;m going to build a bike for my girlfriend with that setup. Hopefully that will end my endless answer of &#8220;no, on the left side click the small lever to go uphill.&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracywilkins</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tracywilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, you&#039;re probably right about that.  The tires on this bike are Continental Gatorskin 28&#039;s, and I currently have the Gatorskin 25&#039;s on the other bike, so I suspect the difference is in the wheels, but the additional weight could be a contributor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you&#8217;re probably right about that.  The tires on this bike are Continental Gatorskin 28&#8242;s, and I currently have the Gatorskin 25&#8242;s on the other bike, so I suspect the difference is in the wheels, but the additional weight could be a contributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://springfieldcyclist.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracywilkins.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/surly-cross-check-review/#comment-733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how much of the speed difference compared to the road bike is the wheel/tire combination? I&#039;d guess MOST of it.

You forgot to rate overall COOL factor. For that, I&#039;d give it an &quot;A.&quot; Almost as good as a Tricross...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how much of the speed difference compared to the road bike is the wheel/tire combination? I&#8217;d guess MOST of it.</p>
<p>You forgot to rate overall COOL factor. For that, I&#8217;d give it an &#8220;A.&#8221; Almost as good as a Tricross&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
